. . . THEY ARE WORSE!
FAR WORSE THAN YOU COULD EVER HAVE IMAGINED!
BUSH GOVERNMENT IN BED WITH THE SPONSORS* OF THE JIHAD?
See continuation of this post at http://islamicdanger4u.blogspot.com/2008/03/bush-to-saudis-can-you-help-us-out-on.html
Comments from http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019446.php#comments
sheik yer'mami says:
Unbelievable. The Bush government is in bed with the ummah.
That's why Bolton was gone.
Who said America can be trusted to do the right thing after it does all the wrong things first?
What a waste.
Did anybody notice that Michelle Malkin is off FOX, but puffpiece Geraldo is still on?
Anybody notice that FOX also doesn't report anything about Muslims/jihad/Islam anymore, but instead focuses on missing girls, women, blond girls, raped girls, whatever, anything to not touch the enemy that has already infiltrated every level of government & the judiciary.
A sad state of affairs...Posted by: sheik yer'mami at January 4, 2008 4:31 PM
TO WHICH Alert REPLIES:
Unbelievable. The Bush government is in bed with the ummah.
Posted by: sheik yer'mami at January 4, 2008 4:31 PM
This is the price for not impeaching Bush for interfering with 9/11 commission. Attentive Americans would have know about Bush involvement with petro-dollars even before election:http://www.inthesetimes.com/issue/25/25/feature3.shtml
But right after 9/11, Bushs feet should have held to fire and no, for the right reasons, that would not be American:
- Right after Islamists attacked on 9/11, this: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010917-11.html
- Bush sided with Saudi Arabia and not 9/11 Commission: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/30/world/main565782.shtml
- While "Bandar Bush" was involved in this: http://mattwelch.com/NatPostSave/bandar.htm
- And this is where the phony 'war on terror' stands: http://whitehouser.com/war/white-house-fox-news-leak-helps-al-qaida/
.. and lies, that follow: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/05/20030516-15.html
Posted by: Alert at January 4, 2008 5:11 PM
Sheik yer’mami wrote
“Did anybody notice that Michelle Malkin is off FOX, but puffpiece Geraldo is still on? Anybody notice that FOX also doesn't report anything about Muslims/jihad/Islam anymore”
This could be due to the fact that Saudi Prince Al-Waleed owns over 5% of Murdoch’s Network. He is the same Saudi Sheik who offered 10 million to New York after 9-11. He said at the time,
"I believe the government of the United States should re-examine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance toward the Palestinian cause."
This believer is, in part, calling the shots at FOX.Posted by: patagonianplato at January 4, 2008 4:49 PM
upon which comment Sneakyzionistcrusader comments:
. . .
Yep that's right Pat and Sheik, did you notice a couple years ago the absences of coverage on the Eurabian Car-B-Ques France riots?
I also recall Robert Spencer talking about the avoidance of the media, fox included, in speaking about the forced conversion of the kidnapped fox journalist and cameraman. They talked at great length about the ordeal except details on their conversion to the religion of peace.
Infiltration is widespread, and US, Western governments policies are all committing suicide.Posted by: Sneakyzionistcrusader at January 4, 2008 5:06 PM
The Solution? It's here, but it will be difficult to get through because of the mask of "religion" that Islam flaunts. Here it is, posted by Charles Martel at http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019446.php#comments:
There is only one solution to this problem - namely the problem of islamization of America in particular and West in general - that is to strip islam from its religious status and to consider it militant ideology, just like fascism and communism were at some point.
We all must concentrate exactly on this single goal, reaching which will deliver the mightiest blow to the enemy.
I am by far not the only one who thinks that way. Jim Horn spoke about status of islam in no uncertain terms addressing the National Federation of Republican Women in Sept 2007, part II at 7:40.
As long as islam is a religion, it can be legally practiced and financed in the USA. But if it is a militant ideology, there is no constitutional protection anymore. This is the fight that could be won, the fight of terminology. Call your representative and senator and tell them that you consider islam as such and such and require that they work on your behalf to denounce religious status of it. That might not work as quickly and efficiently as we would want. There may be a lawsuit required. But we need to do something!Posted by: Charles Martel at January 4, 2008 4:31 PM
Then again PERHAPS NOT!
WHY YOUR GOVERNMENT WILL NOT STOP ISLAM
WHY YOUR GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE THE WILL TO DEFEAT ISLAM or WHY YOUR GOVERNMENT WILL NOT STOP ISLAM - II
Could there be an undercover Moslem Brother amongst the presidential candidates? Hmmmm?
a childhood education in madrassas . . .
. . . can mean nothing. (after all. how many of us remember what was drilled into out heads in our formative years?) and then again, it can lead to great things . . .
(as shown in the link above)
[I can rememeber vividly what I learned during my first four years of schooling. It did make a great impression on my impressionable brain. No tabula rasa there. So could it be with others.]
* Our "good friends and allies," the Saudis
. who are a danger to bloggers all over the world
ARE WE ALL DUPES?
OR IS THERE HOPE FOR US?
All is NOT lost!
No crepe hanger I. This is not a dirge to accompany the funeral of "The World as We Once Knew It."
My experience, upon talking with Iraq service personnel rotated out of Iraq for an all-too brief respite before returning to that seething mess is that they are not as pictured for us on TV as "brothers-in-arms" of the Iraqi Army which is shown as just as eager as we are to fight the "insurgents," who more often than not are allied with these self-same Iraqi "soldiers."
They--our troops--are not mindless dupes of the Administration, of Bush, "Condi" Rice, and the generals all mouthing words of soothing hope for resolving the problem of that "democracy." They get it. They know what Islam is, what the koran is (an unintelligible succession of disconnected passages, signifying little beyond regurgitated and falsified Hebrew and Christian scriptures, toilet rituals, and waxing and waning admonitions to subjugate, convert or kill [wage war upon] us), and how far Moslems can be trusted as fellow warriors in the war against the jihad.
What is best yet is that these troops, upon finally returning home after expending themselves to try and impose Bush's definition of "democracy" on Islamic savages, will know more about Moslems and Islam than the general population. They will not be duped into defending Moslems from the rest of us when push finally comes to shove. The Islamic goons that hold our universities in thrall and the CAIR boys (and girls) will have to skidaddle fast to try and escape from what they deserve.
above excerpt from How many of US are there out there?
So, what will happen?
THERE'S SOMETHING HAPPENING HERE . . .
" . . . the fury that was shown . . . over immigration policies being thrust down our throats is the same fury that is building against those, all those in positions of media and political power, who have failed to instruct, failed to protect, failed to do a damn thing, about the Jihad in all of its manifestations, with all of its varied instruments. "
Posted by: Hugh at Jihad Watch June 14, 2007 12:04 PM
There is just so much, we can stand from our leaders: their incompetence, arrogant ignoring of our wishes(Congress), fixation on Quijotic ideas by the Administration ("democracy" for the Islamic Middle East), FBI sucking up to Moslems (in the hope some will inform in planned acts of terror?), public schools and institutions of higher learning (with federal and local taxpayer funding) allowing Islamic indoctrination of our youth, cries for more "gun control" for citizens while Islamic compounds are left to their own devices--to arm, store explosives, no-go zones for our law enforcement.
Read and think:
DO YOU TRUST GOVERNMENT TO REGULATE GUNS? . . . c...
SHOULD WE PREPARE FOR THE ANTI-JIHAD?
Two Americas: One Blind to Terror Threat
WE FIGHT THEM HERE, WE FIGHT THEM THERE
SHOULD WE ORGANIZE FOR THE ANTI-JIHAD OR SHOULD WE DEPEND ON OUR GOVERNMENT TO PROTECT US FROM EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL JIHADIS?
Ships of War--Ship of Fools
Polarization in the United States
ARMED ISLAMIC COMPOUNDS IN THE US
WHAT IS THIS BLOG ALL ABOUT?
Revolution? Political Grass Roots
WHAT IS WRONG WITH US?
We have the technology to defeat any enemy in the world . . .but . . . . . . we neither have the brains, imagination nor will . . .
JPFO - America's Most Aggressive Defender of Firearms Ownership
AND . . .
Saudi Arabia's past involvement in international terrorism is indisputable
The Saudi-Wahhabi threat must not be underestimated; it requires our grave attention.
Wahhabism is not an old Islamic tradition and the House of Saud does not enjoy a credible historic claim to rule over Arabia.
Wahhabism emerged only 250 years ago under the guidance of an obscure fanatic known as Muhammad Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab who later formed an alliance with a group of desert bandits, the Sauds.
The theological and political pact between the Saud clan and the Wahhabists resulted in the fall of Mecca for the second and last time in 1924, solidifying their grip on power. After the conquest of Mecca, the vast oil wealth of the kingdom would be used to export a radical Wahhabist ideology across the globe.
Even after September 11, the Wahhabi bureaucracy in Saudi Arabia continues to foster religious extremism. When bombs go off in Israel, Kenya, Indonesia, and elsewhere, Saudi Arabia is still the main source of the terrorist money. The kingdom is an unwavering nerve center of ideological indoctrination, incitement, and terrorist financing.
[T]he Saudi family has embarked on an ambitious global campaign to support incubators of violence and extremism from Algeria to the Philippines. In sum, Al-Qaeda would not exist absent Saudi money and membership.
The so-called specialists and academics continue to argue that Islamic terror is the consequence of Islam enduring Western humiliation. But in fact, Saudi Arabia has never been subjugated by the West, instead it has only been cuddled and bribed to ridiculous extremes. And in turn the West has received a torrent of violence and hateful venom.
Saudi Arabia and its militant Islamic doctrines constitute a clear and present danger to the United States and the international community.
Salafism and Wahhabism
So . . .
Why did G. W. Bush insist on hitting Iraq when Saddam was not behind the 9-11 mass murders?
Was it to detract attention from Saudi Arabia, whose citizens were a majority in the 9-11 murderous bunch?
Was it a move that Saudi Arabia would approve, because it was afraid of Saddam's ambitions?
But we still want to know how all this will come to a head, don't we?
well . . .
George Mason (requiescat in pace1) said:
I think that the jihadis will feel so emboldened that they will bring their destructiveness to our homeland. I also think that will be their undoing because I think Mr. and Mrs. Average American will clean them out of America.
What really concerns me, however, is that this may well precipitate another civil war within America. That war will pit those of the Left (the anti-Americans) against those of the Right (the pro-Americans). Wars may be necessary occasionally, but they are never good. Even the best have a real Pyrrhic victory quality to them. Recovering from a civil war would be as horrible as having one. George Mason http://sixthcolumn.typepad.com/sixth_column/
1George Mason sadly passed away in November 2007, at Thanksgiving time
How will the "alliance' between marxists and moslems end? Here's your answer:
Najastani on: MARXISTS, MUSLIMS AND THE BETRAYAL OF THE WORKING CLASS AND SUPPRESSION OF ITS WOMEN
More on civil war in America by George Mason:
A New Civil War Approaches
It should frighten the living hell out of you to realize that, in America, right now, you are living in a cultural milieu horribly similar to that of the Weimar Republic, which made the ascendancy of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis inevitable. If this does not frighten you, then ask yourself whether you can afford to remain ignorant any longer.
America’s culture today comes from its fifth column, made up of America’s Left and its more recent allies, the jihadists. This fifth column intends to bring down America. If you do not understand these groups and processes, you will live to see America’s collapse and its conversion to a totalitarian state, quite possibly even an Islamic one.
Fortunately, there is a cure.
In this article, I emphasize the book, Ominous Parallels: The End of Freedom in America (by Leonard Peikoff; Stein and Day; New York; 1982; ISBN 0-451-62210-3). The author is a professional philosopher with a gift that enables him to speak and write so that intelligent people, not formally trained in philosophy, can understand him and apply what he says directly to their lives.
This truly great book spells out what happened to Germany and above all, WHY it happened. It also spells out how and WHY America has been following Germany’s path and grows dangerously close to the immediate pre-Hitler period of the Weimar Republic. It is these “whys” that make this book uniquely and extremely valuable, and it is the quality of its ideas and their presentation that separates it from all other books which have unsuccessfully tried to account for the reasons for the rise of Nazism.
The current Democrat Party of the USA, straight out of Ominous Parallels, has bedded and wedded the new totalitarians, the ones described so well by David Horowitz recently in Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left (Regnery; New York; 2004; ISBN 0-89526-076-X). [On this website, I have recently reviewed the Horowitz book. BOTH BOOKS COMPLEMENT EACH OTHER WELL.]
It Can Be Stopped, Reversed, Even Cured
There is a permanent cure.
Getting to the correction of our drift as American Weimar into American Nazism, Leonard Peikoff states:
“What fundamental truths did the Nazis and the American collectivists and all their sources in the history of philosophy struggle to evade and annihilate? The answer is contained in two concepts, with everything they include, lead to, and presuppose: reason and egoism. These two, properly understood and accepted, are the immovable barrier to any attempt to establish totalitarian rule.
“Reason destroys fear; egoism destroys guilt. More precisely: reason does not permit man to feel metaphysically helpless; egoism does not permit man to accept unearned guilt or to regard himself as a sacrificial animal.” (302)
All of these virulent socialists have reemerged from the collapse of the old left and old communism to form what Mr. Horowitz properly calls the “neocommunists,” or “neocomms.” The neocomms, however, have devolved from their pining for the new world order of old communism to raw nihilism—destruction of everything. Their goal is to destroy America and everything it stands for, and now they have new partners.
The new partners are the Islamic jihadists, who want exactly the same thing: The destruction of America and all it stands for. This is the hardcore FIFTH COLUMN, with many strap-hangers along for the ride. This is the UNHOLY ALLIANCE David Horowitz presents. And, hold your hats, the Unholy Alliance is WINNING. If we don’t get off our derrieres, we are going to be herded into a totalitarian state worse than any of those in the 20th century, and we will be bowing to Mecca five times a day.
The Unholy Alliance members are organized, and they are speaking with one voice, from one sheet of paper, as the expression goes. We Americans are not organized, nor are we speaking from the same sheet of paper. We are divided, in part by the effect of our own ignorance, direct effects philosopher John Dewey unleashed on American education (from K-12 and through all of the teachers colleges, and into the university system), and the total takeover of academia and all media by neocomms. In short, we are facing a principled and consistent leftist alliance combating US, an under-principled and very inconsistent America and West. If we do not become fully principled, and very consistent in their application, we will lose to this new Fifth Column.
Unholy Alliance rips the scab off the neocomm-jihadist fusion and exposes it to the light of truth in a short, easy to digest, and potent book. You cannot read this book and stick your head in the sand again. You cannot read this book and try to find middle ground or otherwise compromise with your destroyers. You can read this book and get up fighting mad and ready to fight effectively for America.
David Horowitz grew up in a household with American communist parents, and he became a communist. In the 1960s, he became one of the neocommunists and remained one into the 1970s until he got a blinding flash of reason and realized the logical consequences of his allegiance and behavior. Because of his past, however, he knows these people in and out. He can tell the tales better than anyone else around. When David speaks, we should listen.
American intellectuals embraced communism and the Soviet Union in the 1920s and 1930s with a blind adulation that makes me want to vomit. World War II killed communism as a movement, and Stalin’s excesses grossed out even the communists and comsymps or fellow travelers. Communism after WWII ceased as a movement. Subsequently, the failures of socialism around the world became obvious even to the left, and it died also as a movement but not as a force still exerting influence by default. The death of old communism left many ideologically homeless. These homeless did not blame the failed ideologies at all. As Ed Asner said on the radio, they said that the practitioners had failed, not the ideology—the ideology had not been practiced correctly, they firmly believed and believe. This is a major thought disorder neocomms have in common, and they cannot be persuaded from it by reason any more than a schizophrenic can be reasoned out of schizophrenia.
These ideologically homeless coalesced into the New Left, or neocommunists. They retained their love for totalitarian (“utopian”) ideas and their hatred for America and capitalism. Their practice became “creative destruction,” a concept stolen from capitalism and perverted to mean “nihilism.” They hate the present and live in the future. They want to destroy the present world. They hate reality—the world as it IS. They actually believe that they have to destroy America to make it well, which is warmed over Marxism. Believe me, there is nothing original with these people. Their primary goal is NIHILISM, destruction for the sake of destruction, sweetened with some pie-in-the-sky future fantasizing about eventually finding their utopia of no needs, no wants, no differences, no poverty, no wealth, no disruptive progress, and just static ecstasy— like Islam’s Paradise. For now, they want nihilism, hating the good for being good, like Islam.
Neocomms began populating academia in the 1970s, becoming a major influence in academia in the 1980s. By the turn of the 1990s they had taken over the academic fountainhead. It was they who launched “political correctness” and “multiculturalism.” It was they who played the race and gender cards in every contest, no matter how inappropriate. It has been they who took over the minds of the "humanities" graduates, journalists, and politicians. They have successfully bullied the morally uncertain, who now bend obsequiously to political correctness, to get their way. That is why we have this epistemological, moral, and political relativism mess today.
Neocomms really believe that they had been given a green light during the tenure of the Clinton administration, when they felt their kind had come into their own, in and out of office. They proliferated during this period, inserting themselves into every nook and cranny in America that they could. (A Kerry presidency would have utterly revitalized them, and they would have had carte blanche to damage us terribly during his presidency). They took over the Democrat Party and began converting it to what it appears to be today which looks more day by day like America’s Nazi party, replete with Brown Shirts and Brown Skirts, even involving a number of rank and file Democrats who became “Kristallnachters” during the 2004 election season, and even after the election. They have sought and crave power wherever it could and can be begged, bought, or stolen. Like jihadists, they need raw physical power to survive.
Meanwhile, in 1979, Khomeini in Iran launched the jihadism we face today, financed by Iranian oil, aided and abetted by the Sunni Wahhabists in Saudi Arabia, with the consent and funding of the Saudi regime. Islamic nihilism burst onto the world.
Since 11 September 2001, the neocomms and the jihadists in America fused to achieve the same symbiotic end. The two are almost indistinguishable in content, rhetoric, and behavior. As a result, we have a ferociously dangerous FIFTH COLUMN in America and throughout the West. We have organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union, National Lawyers Guild, and Center for Constitutional Rights, ANSWER, Not In My Name, Code Pink, AFCSME and other unions, and many others, linking with the United Nations, Council for American-Islamic Relations, Muslim Brotherhood, Muslim Students Association, Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and many others. Some of these names are from the book, and others I have added because of their obvious neocomm-jihadist orientation. Joining them are strap-hanger Fifth Columnist comsymps in the Democrat Party such as Al Gore, Jimmy Carter, and the Democrat Party dumpling, Michael Moore, as well as almost half the U. S. Senate. The bulk of American journalism—print and broadcast--vibrates in sympathy and support, and almost all of American education at all levels dances to the neocomms-jihadist tunes. This is not “conspiracy theorizing.” It is fact, and Horowitz proves the case.
Their plan is first to paralyze America with legal and moral-appearing means. Then they will move in to kill the paralyzed beast of America.
Mr. Horowitz makes the case and names the names. He threatens this fifth column so much that they have launched a campaign to discredit him and this book. Just that behavior alone should make you run out and buy the book.
The final chapter concerns secessionism. To the neocomms-jihadists, the goal is to destroy patriotism so that the citizens can secede from the ideas of and the physical existence of America. Read it for yourself. Mr. Horowitz quotes these people liberally here, and throughout the book, because they mince no words about their ideas and intents.
We who love individual freedom, capitalism, and the Constitution of the United States have a clear obligation to defend our values. We start by erasing ignorance and sharpening our awareness. While doing this, we become activists. We start pushing back--in the press, on the air, and in every way we can.
We fight back with the correct intellectual ammunition. Our ideas are better, and we must make them highly visible and dominant. This book is a valuable piece of that intellectual ammunition. Never forget that they are winning, NOT BECAUSE THEIR IDEAS ARE BETTER, but because they are being consistent. Our ideas are better, and with consistent application of reason, we will win.
David Horowitz is the President of the Center for the Study of Popular Culture and editor of Frontpagemag.com, an on-line magazine, which receives over 4.5 million page views a month. He has spoken at more than 200 colleges and universities, and has appeared on Nightline, Crossfire, Today, Good Morning America, C-SPAN, CNBC, Fox News Channel and CBS’s This Morning, and gives hundreds of interviews yearly on radio and television. He has authored numerous books and has started organizations to restore free speech to academia and to correct the drift of the Democrat Party to the aggressive socialist left.
Note: George Mason will be missed. His last notation at his 6th Column Against Jihad blog reads: "
Now that the Leftist anti-Americans have been raked over the coals, let's tackle the jihadists and what they face in the United States.
This what a Texan has to say about the Islamic jihadists' future fate in America:
"They[Europeans. ed] try to integrate with Muslims, they are accepting terrorism and bowing down to the sheiks." Yep, they are trying to intergrate WITH the Muslims, instead of the other way around. You know, the time honored way, where the immigrants intergrate WITH the inhabitants of the country that they migrate TO. Another clue: "You are the same flesh and blood they are - today's Germans are no more and no less capable of genocide than you or I." Yea, we all are from the same blood, but as you know the human race as a whole is a murderous, barbaric bunch. It always has been. Its not any different today, its the same blood. The culture in different areas of the world dictate how thick the membrane is between the barbarian and the civilized person. Or how he reacts to danger. Does he call the police, or does he pick up a gun and confront the danger? Even here in these somewhat United States, the culture differences are easy to spot. If you have been around this Republic or have put some study into it, you will know that Americans as a whole are made up of many cultures, but because of their "Americanization" (is that a word?) they are not like your average [e]uropean (old or new). When you cross over into the south and southwest of this Republic, you have no trouble seeing that these people are really friendly. But if you study people, like some do, you might pick up on something else. "These" people are survivors, the membrane that seperates them from the barbarians is thin, thinner than in other parts of this Republic and much thinner than some parts of the world. So, yes, some Americans are more capable of genocide than other Americans and Germans. Where I live, the most important thing is survival of the family, our children and our women. Nothing is higher than that except God. Our country comes right after our family and way before our lives. Yep, we are willig to die for our country and for our families, but we don't intend to. We intend to make the Islamics die for their Allah. They seem to want to get there so fast, we will be glad to send them.
Papa Ray, West Texas, USA