Monday, February 18, 2008

THE WEST SETS UP ANOTHER ENEMY STATE:

A MOSLEM KOSOVO


". . . . the Islamic world . . . find[s] itself aligned, yet again, with America in promoting Islam and fighting Christianity . . . . "
--Serge Trifkovic

Serbia deprived of what was once its heartland. Nazis stuffed that Serb province with Albanians during World War II to counteract the anti-Nazi Serbs. Moslems--see the Bosnian SS troops--were on the side of the Nazis. The two ideologies are parallel in their racial supremacism and rabid Jew-hatred.

Kosovo: A New Day of Infamy for a New Century
by Srdja Trifkovic

The grotesque charade in Pristina on Sunday, February 17, crowned a decade and a half of U.S. policy in the former Yugoslavia that has been mendacious and iniquitous in equal measure. By encouraging its Albanian clients go ahead with the unilateral proclamation of independence written at the Department of State, the U.S. administration has made a massive leap into the unknown. That leap is potentially on par with Austria’s July 1914 ultimatum to Serbia. The fruits will be equally bitter. While their exact size and taste are hard to predict right now, that in the fullness of time America will come to regret the criminal folly of her current leaders is certain. Their Balkan policy is worse than a crime: It is a mistake.

Having devoted seven News & Views columns to Kosovo over the past year I have little to add to the sordid story of Western deceit, allied with Albanian barbarity, that has culminated in the spectacle in Pristina. Suffice to say that Belgrade vs. Washington, in this particular instance, is the clearest-cut case of “white hats vs. black hats” in today’s world affairs.

Some prominent Americans with no cultural or personal axes to grind are trying, even at this late stage, to check the insanity. Writing in the usually interventionist Wall Street Journal on February 9, Ruth Wedgwood, one of America’s foremost legal scholars, thus warned of the “dangerous precedent to tear apart the territory of a member state of the United Nations”—a move that may cause an unnecessary crisis when America is overengaged elsewhere. “Kosovo’s best (and perhaps only) chance to join Europe’s economy is to ride in as a part of Serbia,” she says, but it is more likely to join the Organization of the Islamic Conference instead. In addition, Wedgwood warns, Kosovo’s proclamation may well destabilize the Old Continent, from Bosnia and Macedonia to Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

NOT IN THE AMERICAN INTEREST—“An imposed settlement of the Kosovo question and seeking to partition Serbia’s sovereign territory without its consent is not in the interest of the United States.” While my friends and I have expressed this view many a time, it was recently stated with greater prominence by John R. Bolton, Peter W. Rodman and Lawrence Eagleburger. Writing in the Washington Times, the three heavyweights called for urgent re-examination of U.S. policy on Kosovo and urged the Bush administration to make it clear that, pending the results of such re-examination, it would withhold recognition of any independence declaration:

Current U.S. policy relies on the unconvincing claim that Kosovo is “unique” and would set no precedent for other troublespots… [E]thnic and religious minorities in other countries already are signaling their intention to follow a Kosovo example. This includes sizeable Albanian communities in adjoining areas of southern Serbia, Montenegro, and especially Macedonia, as well as the Serbian portion of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Recognition … would set a precedent with far-reaching and unpredictable consequences for many other regions of the world. The Kosovo model already has been cited by supporters of the Basque separatist movement in Spain and the Turkish-controlled area of northern Cyprus. Neither the Security Council nor any other international body has the power or authority to impose a change of any country’s borders.

The trio further warned that the current U.S. policy is marked by a dismissive attitude toward Russia’s objections: The United States should not prompt an unnecessary crisis in U.S.-Russia relations, lest Russia withdraws her support on issues such as Iran’s and North Korea’s nuclear intentions. Such cooperation would be undercut by American action calculated to neutralize Moscow’s legitimate concerns regarding Kosovo. On an issue of minor importance to the U.S., they ask, “is this a useful expenditure of significant political capital with Russia?”

Bolton, Rodman and Eagleburger predict that a self-proclaimed “independent state” of Kosovo will be “a dysfunctional one and a ward of the international community for the indefinite future.” It is plagued by rampant corruption and organized crime and a nonviable economy, they point out. Its law enforcement, integrity of the courts, protection of persons and property, and other prerequisites for statehood are “practically nonexistent.” Unilateral declaration of independence recognized by some countries and rejected by many others would only make matters worse by turning Kosovo into yet another “frozen conflict.”

The authors conclude by predicting that, “faced with a choice between Western partnership and defense of their sovereign territory and constitution,” Serbia would opt for the latter and inevitably move closer to Russia as its only protector.

“WHO LOST SERBIA?”—That Serbia is lost to the West is now certain. President Boris Tadic’s narrow victory (51 percent) in the second round of the presidential election in Serbia on February 3 was entirely due to his claim that, as an enthusiastically pro-Western reformist, he could obtain less brutal treatment for Serbia from Brussels and Washington than his “ultra-nationalist” opponent.

In Washington Tadic’s victory was hastily interpreted as a sure sign that the Serbs are throwing in the towel, and that, therefore, the scenario for independence should go ahead. (Had Tomislav Nikolic of the Serbian Radical Party won, they would have said that the scenario should be applied post haste because Serbia is irredeemably nationalist and should be taught a lesson.)

Far from indicating Serbia’s readiness to “accept the inevitable” and sling into the vivisection kennel, however, Tadic’s victory was the last chance for the U.S. and the EU to stop the trainwreck. The anger against the U.S. and the EU will translate into the well-deserved electoral demise for Tadic’s Democratic Party (Demokratska stranka, DS) at the next parliamentary election. That election is now imminent in the next few months.

Serbia’s mood was evident in Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica’s somber speech to the nation, broadcast immediately after the proclamation in Pristina. He said that the “unilateral declaration of the fake state of Kosovo represents the final act of a policy initiated in 1999 with NATO aggression.” He accused the United States of a “merciless violation of international order”:
America humiliated and forced Europe Union to discard its basic principles. Europe bowed before America, and it will be held responsible for all the consequences that will arise from Kosovo’s independence.

It is difficult to make forecasts about Belgrade’s forthcoming responses—not least because they are treated as closely guarded secrets—but the following sequence of events is, in my opinion, at least less unlikely than any other:

The inherent schizophrenia splitting the ruling coalition in Serbia will be subjected to intolerable strains in the next few weeks, primarily over the issue of how to respond to the forthcoming acts of recognition by the United States and leading EU countries. Kostunica favors weighty moves, while Tadic and his ministers will insist on empty gestures—e.g. withdrawing ambassadors from Western capitals—that fall far short of breaking diplomatic relations.

The resulting election will mark the long-overdue demise of the DS, with its worn out Euro-rhetoric that has yielded zero dividends over the past eight years. The winners will be the Radicals (SRS) and Kostunica’s Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS). They will either form a long-overdue coalition, or else Kostunica will try to form a national unity government in which the Radicals will be represented (and from which Tadic and his DS will stay away because their “friends” in Brussels and Washington would never allow them to be in the same room with Nikolic).

The entity proclaimed in Pristina will be recognized by the United States, by most of the Islamic world—which will find itself aligned, yet again, with America in promoting Islam and fighting Christianity in the Balkans—and by about a half of the European Union’s 27 members. Washington will claim to have the “international community” behind it, but in order to do so many small and weak countries, from Haiti to Tonga to Vanuatu, will be bribed, cajoled, or bullied into recognition.

“KosovA” will NOT be recognized by Russia, China, India, Brazil, Indonesia (the most populous Muslim country), by most of black Africa, and by at least half-dozen EU member-countries. The non-recognizing countries’ population will exceed by two-to-one that of the Willing. The “international community” will be finally seen for what it is: an empty slogan, an invention of Washingtonian hegemonists and Euro-globalists devoid of substance or authority.

Kosovo will linger on for a few years, as an expensive albatross costing American and “willing” taxpayers a few billion a year. It will continue developing, not as a functional economy but as a black hole of criminality and Jihad terrorism. The ever-rising and constantly unfulfilled expectations of its unemployable multitudes will eventually turn—Frankenstein’s monster-like—against the entity’s creator. There will be many Ft. Dixes to come, at Camp Bondsteel and at home.

The precedent of Kosovo will destabilize many countries with restive and separatist-minded minorities, including America’s friends in Turkey (Kurds), Pakistan (Pashtuns), and above all in the ever-dysfunctional Dayton-Bosnia, with no dividend of any kind in the Islamic world as a whole for the United States on the account of its championing the Muslim cause in the Balkans.

The U.S.-led Kosovo policy in the end will prove to be a blessing in disguise for Serbia. Only by NOT joining the European Union will she preserve her identity, her traditions, and her faith. Only by NOT joining the U.S.-hegemonized system of military alliances will she avoid having her youths put in harm’s way for nothing, in some arid, hostile faraway lands. Only by forging an ever-tighter political, economic, and eventually military alliance with Russia will Serbia avoid the clutches of a postmodern “American” empire devoid of a single redeeming feature.

God sometimes acts in mysterious ways, and on this 21st Century Day of Infamy, February 17, we should ask for His mercy and thank Him for his blessings. Kosovo had remained Serbian during those five long centuries of Ottoman darkness, to be liberated in 1912. It is no less Serbian now, the ugly farce in Pristina notwithstanding. It will be tangibly Serbian again when the current experiment in Benevolent Global Hegemony collapses and when the very names of Messrs. Bush, McCain and Clinton are deservedly consigned to the dustheap of history.

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=515#more-515


From Serge Trifcovic's

Kosovo as a Symbol of Anti-Postmodernism

Reference sent to us by DP111 (at Islamic Danger)

[This post appeared previously as http://islamicdangerfu.blogspot.com/2007/12/from-serge-trifcovics-kosovo-as-symbol.html and prior to that as http://islamic-danger.blogspot.com/2007/12/from-serge-trifcovics-kosovo-as-symbol.html]

Let us look instead at the manifestations of the Western elite class’s pathology in their own countries, or—to be more precise—in the countries over which they rule but to which they no longer feel any natural bond of kinship and obligation.

The present technological, cultural and financial strength of Europe is a façade that conceals an underlying moral and demographic weakness.
***
Europe’s demographic self-annihilation is a phenomenon of world-historical proportions.
***
Europe is losing the ability to define and defend itself, to the benefit of unassimilable multitudes filled with contempt for the host-society. One consequence is that active Jihadist networks now exist in every country west of the former Iron Curtain.
***
The capital of the European elite class is Brussels, the headquarters of the European Union, which has decreed that member countries of the European Union no longer make the law on their immigration policies.
***
A century ago Europe’s ruling classes shared social commonalities that could be observed in Monte Carlo, Carlsbad, or Paris, depending on the season. Their lingua franca was French. Englishmen, Russians, or Austrians shared the same outlook and sense of propriety, but they nevertheless remained rooted in their national traditions. Today’s "United Europe" is light years away from that a century ago. It does not create social and civilizational commonalities, except on the basis of wholesale denial of old inherited values and "traditional" culture. It creates cultural similarity that has morphed into dreary sameness of anti-discriminationism.
***
An ideological commitment to neoliberal globalization has turned multiculturalism and open-ended Muslim immigration into two inviolable Euro-dogmas. They are pursued independently of any electoral test.
***
Even if the Serbs are robbed of Kosovo, Islam will not thank the West. There will be no synthesis, no civilizational cross-fertilization, between Europe and Islam. It’s kto-kogo. As things stand now the outcome appears almost fatally preordained. The tradition of a peasantry ruled by its "betters" has been turned on its head: in Europe most nations want to defend themselves—even the ultra-tolerant Dutch have seen the light after Theo van Gogh’s murder—but cannot do so because they are hamstrung by a ruling class composed of guilt-ridden self-haters and appeasers.
***
For those reasons too, Serbia must not give up Kosovo. By giving it up it would encourage the spirit that seeks the death of Europe and its surrender to the global totalitarianism of Muhammad’s successors.

These are excerpts of some cogent points made by Mr. Serge Trifcovic
from his
Kosovo as a Symbol of Anti-Postmodernism

You must read the whole thing at Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture
to gain a deeper understanding about whose gain will be Europe's loss.
http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=416

Also, see
http://islamic-danger.blogspot.com/2007/12/problem-of-resurgent-islamic-jihad-and.html
http://islamic-danger.blogspot.com/2007/12/israel-and-u.html
http://islamic-danger.blogspot.com/2007/12/puzzled-by-whats-going-on-in-washington.html

NOTE: If you cannot access the above posts, please be patient, I will transfer them to a viable blog as soon as I can. Leslie White

Kosovo is important because that is where the war of multiculturalism started, and where the final outcome will be decided.


Recent Kosovo posts

FROM JIHAD WATCH

Fitzgerald: Independent Kosovo
Among major world powers, both Russia and China are opposed to an independent Kosovo. Even within Europe there are nations that oppose this independence -- Spain -- and others where many are uneasy. It would have been politically possible for the American government to have thought a bit more about the implications, the consequences, of having another Muslim state -- the product of centuries of Ottoman rule . . .

Thousands of Kosovars chant "KLA! KLA!"
From "Kosovo Declares Independence From Serbia: Braces for a Bitter Showdown," by Nabi Qena and William J. Kole for the Associated Press: In the capital, Pristina, the mood was jubilant. Thousands of ethnic Albanians braved subfreezing temperatures to ride on...
Posted by Robert on February 18, 2008 12:33 PM

Free Kosovo will be a door for Islamic jihadists
John Bolton says what we have been saying here all along. "Free Kosovo a Door for Islamic Radicals," from Javno (thanks to larwyn): Independent Kosovo will endanger the stability in the Balkans once again, estimated the American ambassador at the...
Posted by Robert on February 18, 2008 6:39 AM

"Pre-independence euphoria" in Kosovo
Cyprus is the European Union's lone holdout in supporting independence for Kosovo. Gee, why is that? Could it be their common history with Serbia with respect to having its territory eaten away for the sake of Muslim interests? "Pre-independence euphoria...
Posted on December 10, 2007 7:37 PM

Debate on U.S. Kosovo Policy Brewing in Washington
One of the supreme ironies of the "Global War on Terror" has been the consistency with which the US has pursued pro-jihadist foreign and military policies since the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. Not even the spectacular carnage of...
Posted on November 5, 2007 8:44 PM

Jihad and Kosovo: What Are They Thinking in Washington?
Short answer: not much. At an April 17, 2007, hearing on Kosovo, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Tom Lantos (D-CA) called upon “jihadists of all color and hue” to see Kosovo as “yet another example [sic: presumably a reference to...
Posted by Robert on October 22, 2007 5:56 AM

Fitzgerald: Every government official, every FBI agent, every DHS bureaucrat should have Raymond Ibrahim's book
It soon became clear why these particular documents had not been directed to the West. They were theological treatises, revolving around what Islam commands Muslims to do vis-à-vis non-Muslims. The documents rarely made mention of all those things —...
Posted on September 30, 2007 6:49 AM

Hiding Genocide in Kosovo
Old habits die hard: A yellow cross fixed by German NATO to the door of a Serbian house to show that Christians live there NEW -- available now from The American Council for Kosovo: Hiding Genocide in Kosovo: A...
Posted by Robert on July 24, 2007 7:43 AM

Jihad Watch censorship update
The Washington Times, Bruce Thornton, and K-Lo at The Corner have written in support of Jihad Watch during this attempt to silence us, as have many others, including Jawa Report, Vigilant Freedom, Foehammer, Tongue Tied, Endiana, Winds of Jihad and...
Posted by Robert on July 13, 2007 7:59 AM

"Already, a body of impartial evidence strongly suggests an inexplicably steady policy of accommodation by the United States to Islamist demands"
In "Kosovo conundrum" in the Washington Times (thanks to all who sent this in), Michael Djordjevich of the Studenica Foundation discusses U.S. aid for the Kosovo jihad: ...Kosovo is unfinished business, left over from the violent dissolution of Yugoslavia in...
Posted by Robert on June 29, 2007 10:25 AM

Bush condemns radical Muslims in visit to mosque
"It is these radicals who are Islam's true enemy." Fair enough. Certainly the jihadists have never hesitated to target Muslims whom they didn't deem sufficiently Islamic. Just think for a moment, however, about what we do not see: we don't...
Posted by Robert on June 27, 2007 1:26 PM


FROM DHIMMI WATCH

John McCain armed Kosovo Islamic terrorists
Of course, helping the KLA was all the rage at one time, with the usual short-sightedness and Fantasy-Based Analysis that generally prevails in Washington. We can only hope that if McCain is elected (and I still rather suspect that the...
Posted by Robert on February 15, 2008 8:47 AM

Fjordman: The European Union and the Islamization of Europe
Here's the latest from the noted European essayist Fjordman: Hugh Fitzgerald of Jihad Watch recently suggested a number of things Europeans can do to halt Islamization. The proposals were good, but I think we should focus on the most important...
Posted by Robert on February 9, 2008 7:03 AM

Kosovo: Throwing the jihadists a bone
Throwing the jihadists a bone in the form of the Serbian province of Kosovo still dominates official thinking (if one can call it that) in Washington. Counter Walid Phares: Will the US also please the Wahhabis by forcing India to...
Posted by Robert on December 13, 2007 11:48 AM

Fjordman: Why We Should Oppose an Independent Kosovo
The Euroessayist Fjordman explains why an independent Kosovo will help no one except the global jihadists. Hans Rustad runs Document.no, the largest independent weblog in my country. A recent post there contained criticism of me, and I have already answered...
Posted by Robert on December 4, 2007 2:43 PM

Islam and the nation-state
If the light bulb has yet to go on in Washington that U.S. sponsorship of Muslim-only jihad states is a bad idea -- whether in "Palestine" or Kosovo -- it certainly is on in Jerusalem. Writing in the Jerusalem Post,...
Posted by Robert on November 15, 2007 10:18 PM

"U.S. Kosovo Policy Is Bad for Israel"
From Israel's prestigious Begin-Sadat Center, Bar Ilan University: The more you pull the thread to appease the jihadists, the more the sweater unravels. Hand them Kosovo today, the more pressure builds to chop up Israel too. "Strong American support for...
Posted by Robert on November 8, 2007 12:01 AM

Kosovar students defy headscarf ban
And so it begins. By Nebi Qena for Associated Press (thanks to the Constantinopolitan Irredentist): SRBICA, Serbia - Three students were suspended from school in Kosovo this week for wearing Muslim headscarves, reflecting a debate that is echoing across Europe...
Posted by Robert on September 23, 2007 6:48 AM

U.N. troops accused of abetting genocide
Surprise, surprise. From WorldNetDaily.com (thanks to all who sent this in): WASHINGTON – United Nations forces moved into Kosovo in 1999 to "stop genocide." But, according to a blistering new report from the American Council for Kosovo, U.N. troops have...
Posted by Robert on August 31, 2007 7:38 AM

Gorin: The Farce of Our Kosovo Mission
At FrontPage is Julia Gorin's response to an absolutely incredible effort (evidently successful) to muzzle a U.S. soldier in Kosovo who has been trying to blow the whistle on the jihad violence directed against Serbian Christians. On top of it,...
Posted by Robert on August 8, 2007 5:46 AM

Bush Policies Promote Global Jihad
Cliff Kincaid tells the sobering truth at AIM: Conservative thinker and strategist Paul Weyrich sees a Republican political disaster in 2008 because of Iraq. "I believe that the Democrats, most likely with Senator Hillary R. Clinton (D-NY) as the nominee,...
Posted by Robert on July 31, 2007 2:24 PM

Fitzgerald: We don't need to be friendly with Muslim countries
“The US really needs to be friendly to Muslim countries,” he [Foreign Minister Syed Hamid Albar] told retired Malaysian diplomats. “This is not a good development as they have just appointed a special envoy to OIC.” Malaysia heads the 57-nation...
Posted on July 10, 2007 10:07 AM

Fitzgerald: Nonsense and lies, and those who fall for them
This statement issued by some Muslim groups, in order to protect Islam from scrutiny and to prolong the unwariness of Infidels, is a farrago of nonsense and lies. My favorite is this: "The unity of our society must be maintained...
Posted on July 7, 2007 8:48 AM

No comments:

Post a Comment