Monday, March 30, 2009

Muslims Get Pork Banned at G20 Summit Banquet

(. . . and at other places, especially in the UK)

Photo courtesy of

Story at Islam In Action: Muslims Get Pork Banned at G20 Summit Banquet
and at


Pork these Moslems! Pork 'em for trying to impose their ill-conceived "rules for living" on the world.

Based on a primitive's ramblings and remembrances of what he heard about the extant religions, these rules are as worthless as is the entire Islamic ideology--except for giving its followers permission to rob, rape, maim, kill, and overrun the lands of all those who do not follow it.

By placating these Mohammedans, our side loses the best weapon it has for survival: keeping these primitives separated from us.

This can be effected first by keeping Moslems out of our countries and countries and not allowing those already in them any special rights and privileges.

Second, Mohammedans must be allowed to stew in the cesspools of their own making without us giving them any relief.

Any aggressive action by Islamics outside of the areas they occupy must be punished with such severity that it will not be repeated.

We must look back on our history and use the same strategy and tactics that had beaten back Moslem forces and kept them confined in their areas before.

Keeping Islamic countries completely isolated at this time is not possible as they provide a market for armaments (Saudis etc.) and technology (Iran etc.) and other goods.

This opening is provided by Islamic purchasing power obtained through control of oil resources. Depriving Islamic control of major oil reserves or switching to alternate energy will alleviate this situation.

These actions must, at this time, be confined to a wish list. No Western government nor a majority of Western countries' populations appear to be willing to go down that road.

What can you, as an individual, or part of a pro-survival minority, do to keep Islam out of our lives?

Briefly, do not buy products from Islamic countries, do not deal with Islamic businesses in your country (e.g. Ethan Allen furniture) that finance the Islamic jihad, on a local level, do not give in to Islamic demands for special rights.

Support the availability of pork products, and pork those Islamics who demand that they be removed to follow the dictates of a mentally deranged primitive who lived in the 7th century.

. . . And see below

Even More Drastic Times Call for Even More Drastic Measures
[This post has new IMPORTANT information added!]
. . . and it's getting drasticker and drasticker all'a the time!


BELIEVE ME! ('cause I've read a lot of 'em)

It ain't Politically correct, and it ain't nice. But then neither is Islam. So, take your pick.

The man who wrote these methods of counter-Islam speaks from experience.

Listen to him, PLEASE:


Islam is a primitive and brutish religion and unfortunately hence, only
primitive and
brutish methods work with islam

As a rule of thumb, muslims are peaceful as long as they are below a
critical threshold
As soon as they cross that threshold, they are a menace

The key then is to dilute muslims below the critical mass

This critical mass is a function of the local kafir community

For example, among a sikh host, the critical % for muslims is about 65%
Among PC infected white Europeans, this critical % is 5%

The first and foremost is to recognise that the lands of islam are lost
and the only thing to do is to evacuate the residual kafirs
A cordon sanitaire needs to be imposed on darul islam
mid-east Christians, bangladeshi hindus, etc this extra 20 - 30 million
will dilute the muslims below critical mass
In addition, east asians, south americans can be imported to dilute
below critical mass

The next thing is to raise fertility of kafir women
In short we have to counter breed against islam
He that is born will die , she that is born will breed 5 , either as a
kafir woman now,
or inside an islamic harem later

This demographic surge of islam will end in 30 years, contain this and
will implode
Muslims were 12% of the world in 1900, and 21% today, solely by

Islam is like a shark, to breathe, a shark has to swim, keep a shark
and it dies
Similarly a contained islam, unable to expand will implode from within

Next, is to import kafirs with a history of success against islamic
Importing Caribean blacks or Sikhs will do the trick
Indian Punjab was 33% muslim in 1947, the sikhs reduced it to 0% in 2
The sikhs used islamic method on muslims
When the sikhs ruled Pakistan, they shut down all the mosques and
were thrown to
their deaths from minarets
When the mullahs declared jihad agains the sikhs, the sikhs invaded
( near Afghanistan )
and cut up the chief mullah and burnt his body
The sikh general Nalwa used mass reprisal terror against muslim
and it was very effective
For any act of islamic terror, he burnt down the nearest muslim town
and no
one allowed to escape
The sikhs have an interesting method to prevent PC
The golden temple has a muslim atrocity museum
You can see sikh gurus tortured to death for refusing to convert to
This is kind of a holocaust museum
In addition, sikhs have a daily evening prayer called Ardas wherein
remember all the sikh victims of muslim atrocities

Next is a policy of active containment
For example strict law enforcement
In Gujurat, Modi has tamed the muslims by periodically cutting off
electricity to muslim areas
and getting them to sweat in the hot Indian sun
and giving the police a free hand to thrash muslims
Strict law enforcement has a side effect, each time the more jihadist
elements come out to protest, thrash them
and the rest get tame

Interestingly the only 2 areas in India free of islamic terrorism is
Indian punjab, where sikhs solved the problem in 1947 and Gujurat where Modi used
islamic methods on muslims

Also another tactic used by hindus in India is economic boycott
For example even in Mumbai, no hindu rents a house to a muslim

My favorite is guided tours of kafir women inside muslim ghettos, where
they can see lecherous islamists
in action first hand and get cured of PC

I would also advice on switching to bio-diesel
Jatropha grows in semi-desert and many trains and cars in India are
switching to biodiesel from Jatropha
Jatropha is far more effective than ethanol

I also suggest setting up pig abatoirs near muslim neighborhoods
Remove halal food from schools based on animal cruelty
Any other tactic for making their daily life miserable

Also consider unleashing Christian missionaries on muslim immigrants
Use rice-Christitianity methods, conversion for services

The spanish inquisition took 120 years to get spain rid of muslims
The sikhs managed it in east punjab in 2 months

But overall the main enemy is within
The politically correct, kafir needs to be defeated before islam can be

Please add links to

this has online books on islamic atrocities in India

[End of Quote]

Oh, and if you're wondering, "What did the Moslems ever do to the Sikhs to deserve such drastic treatment at their hands? Take a gander at

Islam in the Punjab of India
or, if this has been made unavailable by the Islam-intimidated censors,

And now here is what YOU can do.


THE FRENCH (Les enfants de la Patrie) RULED BY MUSULMANS?




1. Don't Rent to Moslems

Oh Heavens! Here in America (the U.S.), you are running head-on into the Fair Housing Laws. That is, it is unlawful to discriminate on the basis of race, creed, color, or national origin.

So, what to do?

a. Pig images outside of building
b. Display Crosses
c. Keep plenty of dogs on premises
d. Display Stars of David
e. Display pictures of the Holy Virgin and Jesus
f. Festoon building with Christmas lights

2. Selling a House

a. Have dogs and running about the property when showing

To Repel Islamics in all Real Estate Transactions:

Use OUR seasonal symbols--much as crosses are used to keep vampires at bay--to repel Islamics. Halloween brings witches and goblin decorations but also lends itself to having pig masks about. Thanksgiving can be celebrated with images of kneeling pilgrims. Christmas and Easter are times of great religious outpourings with nativity scenes, palm crosses, etc. And don't forget the Hannukah menoras.

This holds whether you are religious or secular--be creative!

Now, I realize that all this is not PC. But, in time of need, the devil will eat flies (In der Noht, frisst der Teufel Fliegen).

I know, I know, there are some perfectly charming people who happen to be Moslem. I have known some myself. Probably (one hopes) that they will remain "perfectly charming" and not turn into nasty (and deadly) jihadists. But, how's one to know? How can we tell when the "nice" son (or daughter) of the Moslem family next door decides to join THE JIHAD?

We cannot. The only "moderate" Moslem is one that is no longer alive. If he (or she [Muslimah]) wakes up (while still alive) and sees how repulsive the ideology codified in the Koran is--and tried to leave Islam--becomes an apostate--he or she is under Islamic sentence of death.

In denying real estate--whether for a convenience store or for a MOSQUE--to Moslems, you will run into "Fair Housing" laws here in the U.S. Be creative. I will not publicly suggest that you circumvent any law. If you use the suggested techniques, you will not be doing so.

You must put economic self-interest aside--and be an idealist--or you will become a slave of Islam.

2. Economic Boycott

a. Don't Buy from Moslem Businesses

Do not deal with Moslems, no matter how doe-eyed and sweet, how polite, at convenience stores, gas stations, etc.

Do you know that Ethan Allen furniture is run by a Moslem? Sadly, this so-American brand name is not a true American firm. Its owner supports Islamic supremacy causes.

Do Not Buy Ethan Allen Furniture!

The practice of boycotting local Moslems is repulsive. It is reminiscent of what the Nazis did to Jews, The difference, however, is that while the Jews did not have an agenda for taking over the country, Moslems do.

Don't know whether it's a Moslem business?

Find them here:

Islamic Finder

or here:

Islam Finder

3. Local Action

a. No Mosques! Do not allow mosques to be built. Use ordinances, codes, zoning restrictions, etc. to keep this from happening.

Get involved in local government, school boards, neighborhood groups to keep the mosques out of your bailiwick.

b. Not only do NOT vote for, but actually oppose any Moslem candidate running for political office. No matter what party nominates him or her.

c. School Boards must not allow Ramadam or any religious dispensation for Moslems. No halal food in school cafeterias.

d. Organize attorneys to fight (pro bono, if possible) any attempts by Moslem groups to force ordinances or laws on local government such as removing crosses etc.

Even if you are secular, join with religious groups to oppose Moslem attempts to Islamicize. Make alliances with any group that has the same goal as yours--to keep Islam out of America.

e. Do not make Moslem friends, no matter how nice they are--at work, in the PTA, in the neighborhood. You will meet perfectly decent Moslems. Do not succumb! You are fighting to keep your country from going Islamic.

ISLAM IS NOT "JUST ANOTHER RELIGION," it is a foreign ideology whose proponents will eat you alive, if given half a chance!

f. Spread anti-Moslem sentiment among ethnic groups that are vulnerable to Islamic "missionaries" (Da'awa).

The Caribbean Africans suggested by my East Indian colleague COULD be vulnerable. Point out the Arab (Moslem) predeliction for slave trading. The Islamic references to blacks as "raisins" can serve you well there.

g. Keep Moslems from joining any lodge or Veterans organization to which you belong.

h. If you have any more ideas, post them here under COMMENTS [here] and I will add them.

[the foregoing is taken from]

Also see How to Stop Islamization--Drastic Times Call for Drastic Measures

Sunday, March 22, 2009


from the International Free Press Society

"I am not Jewish but…"

by Rupert Murdoch


IN THE WEST, we are used to thinking that Israel cannot survive without the help of Europe and the United States. Tonight I say to you: Maybe we should start wondering whether we in Europe and the United States can survive if we allow the terrorists to succeed in Israel.

In this new century, the "West" is no longer a matter of geography. The West is defined by societies committed to freedom and democracy. That at least is how the terrorists see it. And if we are serious about meeting this challenge, we would expand the only military alliance committed to the defense of the West to include those on the front lines of this war. That means bringing countries such as Israel into NATO

The free world makes a terrible mistake if we deceive ourselves into thinking this is not our fight.

In the end, the Israeli people are fighting the same enemy we are: cold-blooded killers who reject peace, who reject freedom and who rule by the suicide vest, the car bomb and the human shield.

Against such an enemy, I will not second-guess the decisions of a free Israel defending her citizens. And I would ask all those who support peace and freedom to do the same.

Adapted from a March 4 speech to the American Jewish Committee by [Rupert Murdoch] the chairman and CEO of News Corporation on receiving its National Human Relations Award.

Friday, March 13, 2009

The Charade Moves On: "Peace in the "Middle East" a la ObamaHillary


Hillary Clinton says: "Palestinians get no aid unless they recognize Israel"

Empty Threat

"Clinton Tells PA to Recognize Israel or No Aid," from CBNNews

Monday, March 9, 2009

“absurd and inconsistent fables” by "a charlatan, a fraudulent trickster"

Guess what and whom Al-Razi was talking about?

Emerging Muslim Freethinkers and the Battle of Civilizations

. . . [T]he Islamic world once excelled the rest in the so-called Golden Age of Islam (800–1200 CE).

. . . [A] deviation from true Islam set the emergence of the Islamic Golden Age in motion, albeit on the wings of heresy and theological compromise of all sorts. We see the greatest-ever Muslim scientist and thinker, Al-Razi (d. 945), calling Prophet Muhammad a charlatan, a fraudulent trickster; responding to Allah’s challenge of creating a book like the Quran, he called it an assorted mixture of “absurd and inconsistent fables”. The writings of Plato, Aristotle, Euclid, and Hippocrates—he asserted—contained much greater wisdom and brought greater service to humanity than the Holy Scriptures, which brought more harm than good.

The Time of Al-Razi
Second Half of Ninth Century

The whole ninth century was essentially a Muslim century. This more clear in the second half than of the first, since all the scientific leaders were Muslims, or at any rate were working with and for Muslims and wrote in Arabic.

And from

Al-RAZI (Rhazes):

" . . . God has provided what we need to know, not in the arbitrary and divisive gift of special revelation, which only foments bloodshed and contention, but in reason, which belongs equally to all. Prophets are impostors, at best misled by the demonic shades of restless and envious spirits. But ordinary men are fully capable of thinking for themselves and need no guidance from another. One can see their intelligence and ingenuity in the crafts and devices by which they get their living, for it is here that they apply their interest and their energy. Intellectuals who have not devoted their energies, say, to mechanical devices would be baffled by the skills and techniques of such men; but all human beings are capable of the independent thinking that is so critical to human destiny. It is only because the philosopher has applied himself to abstract speculations that he has attained some measure of understanding in intellectual matters.

Asked if a philosopher can follow a prophetically revealed religion, al-Razi openly retorts: 'How can anyone think philosophically while committed to those old wives' tales, founded on contradictions, obdurate ignorance, and dogmatism (muqim 'ala 'l-i¦htilafat, musirr 'ala 'l-djahl wa 'l-taqlid)?' Al-Razi takes issue with ritualism for what he sees as its obsession with unseen and unseeable sources of impurity; but he also combats the natural tendency of his contemporaries to think of philosophy as a dogmatic school or even a sect, their expectation that a philosopher should believe and behave as Socrates or Plato did. Like many philosophers, he has difficulty explaining to others that philosophical disagreements and divergences of outlook are not a scandal but a source of vitality. A philosopher, he urges, does not slavishly follow the actions and ideas of some master. One learns from one's predecessors, to be sure, but the hope is to surpass them. Al-Razi admits that he will never be a Socrates, and cautions against anyone's expecting in short order to rival Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Theophrastus, Eudemus, Chrysippus, Themistius or Alexander of Aphrodisias. But he also affirms a belief in progress, at least for
individuals, and denies that one is trapped within the teachings of the great founders of traditions: 'You must realise,' he tells Abu Hatim, 'that every later philosopher who commits himself creatively (idjtahada), diligently, and persistently to philosophical inquiry where subtle difficulties have led his predecessors to disagree, will understand what they understood and retain it, having a quick mind and much experience of thought and inquiry in other areas. Rapidly mastering what his predecessors knew and grasping the lessons they afford, he readily surpasses them. For inquiry, thought and originality make progress and improvement inevitable.' The smallest measure of original thought, even if it does not reach unrevisable truth, al-Razi insists, helps to free the soul from its thrall in this world and secure for us that immortality which was so wrongly described and so vainly promised by the prophets.


Iranian Muslim Philosopher
Abu Bakr Mohammad Ibn Zakariya al-Razi (864-930 A.D.) was born at Ray, Iran. Initially, he was interested in music but later on he learned medicine, mathematics, astronomy, chemistry and philosophy from a student of Hunayn Ibn Ishaq, who was well versed in the ancient Greek, Persian and Indian systems of medicine and other subjects. He also studied under Ali Ibn Rabban. The practical experience gained at the well-known Muqtadari Hospital helped him in his chosen profession of medicine. At an early age he gained eminence as an expert in medicine and alchemy, so that patients and students flocked to him from distant parts of Asia.

From . . .

The Alchemy web site on
History of Islamic Science 3
Based on the bookIntroduction to the History of Science
by George Sarton
(provided with photos and portraits)
Edited and prepared by Prof. Hamed A. Ead
These pages are edited by Prof. Hamed Abdel-reheem Ead, Professor of Chemistry at the Faculty of Science -University of Cairo, Giza, Egypt and director of the Science Heritage Center

The Persian al-Razi was simply the greatest clinician of Islam and of the whole middle ages; he was also, as we have seen, a chemist and physicist. It would be difficult to choose between him and his contemporary al-Battani: both were very great scientist who would have been conspicuous in any age. I decide to call this period "The Time of al-Razi" because the physician is known to the larger public than the astronomer, and also because his influence can be traced more directly throughout many centuries of human effort, East and West. I have already remarked that al-Razi might be considered to be one of the forerunners of the iatrochemists of the Renaissance. He wrote an immense medical encyclopaedia called Al-hawi ("Continens") and a monograph on measles and smallpox which is the masterpiece of Muslim medicine. Ya'qub ibn akhi Hizam was the author of a treatise on horsemanship, which contains some rudiments of veterinary art, the earliest work of its kind in Arabic.

The Time of Al-Razi

AKA Abu Bakr Muhammad Ibn Zakariya al-Razi
Born: c. 865 AD
Birthplace: Ray, Persia
Died: 27-Oct-925 AD
Location of death: Ray, Persia
Cause of death: unspecified
Gender: Male
Religion: Muslim
Race or Ethnicity: Middle Eastern
Occupation: Doctor, Scholar, Philosopher
Nationality: Ancient Persia
Executive summary: Persian alchemist, discovered sulfuric acid

Birthday Is Holiday Razi Day (27 Aug, Iran) Risk Factors: Blindness

Saturday, March 7, 2009

Mohammedan Outreach to Jews

Book 041, Number 6985
Translation of Sahih Muslim:

Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.

A collection of the ahadith in Sahih Muslim

Translation of Sahih Muslim
Translator: Abdul Hamid Siddiqui
The Book Pertaining to the Turmoil and Portents of the Last Hour (Kitab Al-Fitan wa Ashrat As-Sa`ah)

BUT . . .

"MSA removes, does not repudiate genocidal hadith"

Try to find this verse, it has disappeared

Bad publicity for "The Religion of Peace"

Monday, March 2, 2009

Scots Wha Hae - for Moslems Bled - from Gates of Vienna

Gates of Vienna: The Scots are Profiling Muslims — Favorably: "Scottish forces ordered to give priority to crimes against Muslims

by Dean Herbert

Police in Scotland have been ordered to give special priority to crimes where the victims are Muslim.

In a move that last night sparked a fresh row over political correctness, a senior officer revealed that the race and religion of a victim has now become a crucial factor in how police respond to crime.

Inspector Tom Galbraith, of Lothian and Borders Police’s diversity unit, told a conference on tackling terrorism that it was important to stop Scottish Muslims feeling “vulnerable” in case they were driven towards radicalism."

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Rape the Women! - It is "Permitted"

Women whom your right hand possesses ...

from Thoughts of a nationalist Indian:

"...Except those captives whom your right hand possesses"

Kuran Sura 4, Ayat 24 says:

And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess...

. . . soldiers were reluctant to rape the captured women in front of their husbands. That is when Muhammad produced Kuran 4:24 assuring them that it was permissible to rape these captured women even in front of their husbands.

More at


More on Sex with Slave-girls and Captive-Women
by Abul Kasem

I READ QUITE a number of posts on the sexual use of slave-girls and captive women in Islam. It is quite amusing to note the desperation of a few 'Islam lovers' to save Islam from the stigma of abysmal sexual exploitation of slave-women and women-captives caught in a war. Here is what the 'real Islam' says about having sex with slave-girls and captives (women, of course). These passages are extracted from my detailed essays: 'Sex and Sexuality in Islam' and 'Root of Terrorism-Islamic Style.'

My question is: Who knows Islam best?-the Imams, the impeccably qualified (Islamically, of course), Mullahs, the Pirs, Tabari, Ghazali, Ibn Ishaq, Ibn Sa'd, Sahih Hadith, Hedaya (Hanafi Laws of Islam, vetted by the Inns of Law, London to be the most authentic), Umdat al-Salik (the most authentic Shafi Laws, authenticated by the Al-Azhar Islamic University) or the western educated, western-settled Muslims who claim they have discovered a new brand of Islam-Islam sans politics, and of late, Islam sans those obnoxious ahadith?

When we point out from those impeccable Islamic sources the true and unadulterated Islam preached and practiced by Muhammad, these New Islamic Scholars would quote from personalities such as: Gandhi, Carlyle, Barnard Shaw, John demonstrate the 'beautiful' face of Islam. It is as if these kaffirs know Islam more/better than Muhammad did!

This gets very funny indeed! How about those despicable verses in the Qur'an which unmistakably demonstrate the utter sexual perversions, vis--vis slave-girls and captive women? Are these new Islamically educated, western-inclined Islamic scholars ready to discard those Qu'ranic verses as well? I would like to hear from them. This will really be very interesting, no doubt.

See 'Sex and Sexuality in Islam': by by Abul Kasem

and go to see Excerpts from an Islamic Q & A site - scroll down to them at

from The Moslem Institute

After attacking and looting the Jewish city of Khaibar, Mohammed compelled a beautiful and grieving teenage girl named Safiyah to become his sex-slave bride. At the time the captive was mute with shock and grief. According to the Moslem website (note, enter Safiyah in the search box to bring up the article) "… two women were brought before the prophet … they had passed by those … killed in the battle … The (one) who was mute with shock was Safiyah … whose husband (and other family members) had been killed ..."(by Mohammed’s followers). (Note: The parenthetical remarks were added by historian Dane Dahl to clarify the text.)

One of Mohammed’s bodyguards witnessed Mohammed raping the beautiful and grieving Safiyah. "Ayyub al-Ansari (Mohammed’s bodyguard) guarded the tent of the prophet the whole night … (While Mohammed forced his lust upon his newest sex slave. The next morning Ayyub al-Ansari told Mohammed) 'I was afraid for you with this young lady. You killed her father, her husband and many of her relatives … I was really afraid for you on her account .'" (Note: The parenthetical remarks were added by historian Dane Dahl to clarify the text.)

Yet militant Moslem propaganda is hateful enough to boast this heart-broken sex slave grew to love Mohammed! According to the Moslem website: "She (Safiyah) was known for her extreme beauty … She did not only love Prophet … Mohammed deeply, but also greatly respected him as Allah’s Messenger … She was honored and given great respect in the Moslem community."

In the author's [Dane Dahl's] opinion, such boasting is cruel and ludicrous, especially when taken in the context of the historical record.