Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Claim that Koran is "Unchangeable" word of God Found to be False

Gerd R Puin’s photo of one Sana’a Qur’anparchment, showing layered revisions to the Qur’an

Definite proof that the koran has been altered and re-altered since its first being put on animal skins..

A discovery of a veritable heap of ancient koran fragments--dating from the mid-7th Century C.E., is evidence that there were emendations of the original texts--many--and that it destroys . . .

. . . the orthodox Muslim belief that the Qur’an as it has reached us today is quite simply “the perfect, timeless, and unchanging Word of God”. It means Qur’an has been distorted, perverted, revised, modified and corrected, and textual alterations had taken place over the years purely by Human hands.

The sacred aura surrounding this Holy Scripture of Islam, which remained intact for over 14 centuries is gone with this astonishing discovery and the core belief of billion plus Muslims that the Qu’ran is the eternal, unaltered word of God is now clearly visible as a great hoax, a totally downright falsehood. Not only this; the Qur’anic claim that nobody can alter the words of God is also a fake. Qur’an is supposed to be, if we borrow words from Guillaume (1978, p. 74), “The holy of holies. It must never rest beneath other books, but always on top of them, one must never drink or smoke when it is being read aloud, and it must be listened to in silence. It is a talisman against disease and disaster“. Muslims call the Qur’an ‘Mother of Books’ and believe no other book or revelation can compare (Caner & Caner, 2002. p.84). However, it’s all gone now. The end result of whole Islamic struggle for fourteen centuries is a big zero.

As if it is not enough, many manuscripts showed the sign of palimpsests, i.e., versions very clearly written over even earlier washed off versions. The under-writing of palimpsest is, of course, often difficult to read visually, but modern tools such as ultraviolet photography can highlight them. It suggests that the Sana’a manuscripts are not the only variants, but, even before that, Qur’anic text had been modified and re-written on the same paper. It means, Allah’s claim (Q 56: 77-78; 85:21-22) that original text is preserved in heaven on golden tablets, which none can touch except angels is also a fairy-tale.

Read the whole thing at
By Sujit Das

Monday, June 22, 2009

Iran's Tragedy: the coming of . . . Guess What?

First, we read . . .

Cyrus The Great's Prayer @ Persepolis:

"God Bless Iran & Iranians"

Then . . .

From Iran-Online

. . . Since day one of mullahs' regime, Iranians are subject to unfair humiliation abroad by international communities due to rogue behavior of mullahs and their non-stop support for terrorism around the world to protect islamic and arab values, from 1000 miles away in Israel to next door Iraq. Disregarding Iran & Iranians' national interest is barefaced mullahs' name of the game. Mullahs care more about arabs in Israel and shits of najaf or karbala in south of Iraq than Iranian people or Iran's national interest inside or abroad. Mullahs' support goes for very same people whose trying to wipe us all off the planet, from our history to our name. The very same people while were so obsess with pan-arabism leadership of saddam, attacked Iran to manage second invasion barbaric arab muslims which failed miserably.

You may already be aware that the two major news agencies of BBC and Reuters have begun to refer to the "Persian Gulf" as the "Arabian Gulf!"

And Now, it is getting worse. National Geographic Society's mapmakers altered the 8th Edition of the society's influential Atlas of the World to include Arabian Gulf as an alternate name (in parentheses) under the traditional title. This is a slap in the face of any true Iranian, to sit back and watch these organizations deliberately, and systematically, try to wipe us off the face of the map!

These organizations know, or should know, that Iran, or Persia as they call her, is a country with an ancient civilization going back over thousands of years, and that the gulf to the south of Iran has always been called the "Persian Gulf" since the very first maps of those regions were drawn. For thousands of years, the people of ancient Persia and their descendants in modern Iran have called it the "Persian Gulf".

We suppose this is Reuters, BBC and now National Geographic's way of telling us that the West no longer considers us as Iranians (Persians), and that we are Arabs as far as they are concerned!

[The following is A Plea to Iranians]

Are you an arab?

Please, if you do consider yourself a true-blooded Iranian, write to these news agencies and organizations, express your discontent and disgust with their campaign that is aimed at erasing our identity and replacing it with those of the Arabs! We are particularly counting on those of us who live in the West, and have an easier access to computers and Internet, to be vigilant insofar as sending an email to these offending news agencies & organizations , and to encourage others to do the same. . . . tell these organizations: In a respectful way. . . BBC, Reuters and most importantly National Geographic. . . .

[end of "A Plea to Iranians"]

Did you guess correctly?

(what is "Iran's Tragedy?")

still not sure what it is?

Look at . . .



Civilizations Struggling Not To Die: 1. Persian Empire (Present Iran)

We have been struggling with Islam for 1400 years now. We are still alive! Lets keep our holy Persian Culture alive so we will not join the long list of old civilizations extinct by the Islam & presently called "Just another Arab Muslim State"!

Sunday, June 21, 2009

The Lowdown on Iran's "Presidential Candidates" - from Iranians

from "Iranian Presidential Candidates" Bahman Aghai Diba - Persian Journal

The Iranian presidential candidates [that] . . . registered . . . . Almost 500 persons . . . registered. Most of the candidates look[ed] like:
1- Intellectually challenged or mentally retarded persons.
2- The troubled souls that they think they having nothing else to do.
3- The people that have lost their relations with the realties and live in fantasies

Looking at these people, I raised the question to myself: why these persons think that they have the right to a president in Iran? What gives the permission to these persons to think that they have a chance to be the president of Iran?

I immediately found the answer: they see the present rulers of Iran and they think they are better than these persons to run the country. They think if such persons that have the highest posts in the Islamic Republic of Iran are good to be the president or the supreme leader, they have chance too.

The present Supreme Leader in Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, that runs everything from the army to radio and TV, is a good example. How did he become the Supreme Leader? Did he possess special talents? Did the people of Iran vote for him? Did he make a coup? or lead a revolution? Not at all

In fact, when the previous supreme leader died, this one was not even an ayatollah. However, a number of Iranian clerics made a story for him. They said the former one had once said in private that this guy was a supreme leader material. As far as the demands of the Iranians were concerned, they could not be more wrong.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

When Will the Iranian Revolution Be Over?

. . . the "Second" Iranian Revolution . . .

From "Column One: Israel's rare opportunity"

. . . the vast majority of Iran's people wish to live in a normal and free nation-state. For them, the revolution means nothing but privation, suffering, repression and death. They do not hate America and they do not hate Israel. They do not seek nuclear weapons and they do not support the likes of Hamas and Hizbullah.
In an interview this week with National Review Online, Iranian expatriate Amir Taheri explained that Iran suffers from a divided psyche. On the one hand, the mullahs view Iran as a revolutionary vanguard of Islam. They do not see Iran as a nation-state. For them, the normal things that make up a life - economic stability, public safety and the hope that one's children will do better - are of little use as they march forward under the flag of jihad. Israel and the US are necessary enemies.
As Taheri put it, "When we consider Iran as a nation-state, we see Israel as its natural ally. The reason is that Israel, like Iran, is opposed to an exclusively Arab Middle East. Both want a pluralist Middle East in which there is room for diversity; a Middle East where one finds Iranians, Turks, Kurds, Christians and Jews, as well as Arabs."

If Israel extends a hand in friendship to these Iranian patriots, the worst that can happen is that they fail to overthrow the mullahs and we are left to acknowledge that we wished them well. There is no shame in that.

Indeed, if they fail to overthrow the regime, and Israel is compelled to attack their country's nuclear installations, it is hard to imagine that they will take it personally. Rather, recalling that it was Israel that stood with them first, they would no doubt understand why we were forced to act, and perhaps be inspired to try again to free themselves from the shackles of their hideous regime.

Also related:
Caroline Glick: protests in Iran leading to the overthrow of the one of the most heinous regimes on the face of the earth

Question posed in the title of this post:  

When Will the Iranian Revolution Be Over?

Answer: When every mullah (ayatollahs etc.) is hanging from a lamppost.

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Obama: Ignoramus-in-Chief or Liar- in-Chief?

Does Obama Know what He is Talking About?

. . . the late Muslim scholar, Professor Majid Khadduri, wrote the following in his authoritative 1955 treatise on jihad, War and Peace in the Law of Islam :"Thus the jihad may be regarded as Islam’s instrument for carrying out its ultimate objective by turning all people into believers, if not in the prophethood of Muhammad (as in the case of the dhimmis), at least in the belief of God. ...The universality of Islam, in its all embracing creed, is imposed on the believers as a continuous process of warfare, psychological and political if not strictly military."3 source

from Obama: Ignorant of History?

Obama Photo: (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Moslem Integration into American Society:

Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad aka Carlos Leon Bledsoe, home-grown jihadist, convert to Mohammedanism, shoots two American soldiers in Arkansas.

Gives the lie to Obama's Moslem-embracing speech in Cairo's infamous Mosque.

The President of "one of the largest Muslim countries in the world" according to his own words, this mutt--a charlatan and narcissist of the first order--shows where he stands as concerns the Islam's war against the United states and the non-Islamic world.

According to authorities, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad has admitted to the terrorist shooting [of two American Army soldiers. killing one]. He pleaded not guilty to the charges in court this morning.

A prosecutor said Muhammad admitted shooting Long and another soldier "because of what they had done to Muslims in the past."

Crypto-Moslem and Protector of Islam in America Barack Hussein Obama:

"I am deeply saddened by this senseless act of violence against two brave young soldiers who were doing their part to strengthen our armed forces and keep our country safe. I would like to wish Quinton Ezeagwula a speedy recovery, and to offer my condolences and prayers to William Long’s family as they mourn the loss of their son."

Stratfor Research believes it’s because law enforcement has been told to "back off" investigations into the activities of Black Muslim converts.

[P]olitics may have been at play in the Muhammad case as well as in other cases involving Black Muslim converts. Several weeks ago, STRATFOR heard from sources that the FBI and other law enforcement organizations had been ordered to "back off" of counterterrorism investigations into the activities of Black Muslim converts.

One could speculate whether increased sensitivity to the issue due to a new administration caused mid-level bureaucrats to issue such an order to field operatives, or whether it was a direct order originating either from Eric Holder’s Justice Department or the Barack Obama White House.

At this point, it is unclear to us if that guidance was given by the White House or the Department of Justice, or if it was promulgated by the agencies themselves, anticipating the wishes of President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder.